[SCADASEC] Listserver responses

Tue Feb 19 16:52:09 CST 2008

I know I just felt the need to add my $.02 :P

From: scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com
[mailto:scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com] On Behalf Of Mark Fabro
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:18 PM
To: scadasec at news.infracritical.com
Subject: Re: [SCADASEC] Listserver responses

I meant back to SCADA stuff. Sorry for confusion!

  _____  

From: scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com
[mailto:scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com] On Behalf Of Clint Bodungen
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 4:07 PM
To: scadasec at news.infracritical.com
Subject: Re: [SCADASEC] Listserver responses

SCADASEC - Oops.

From: scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com
[mailto:scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com] On Behalf Of Mark Fabro
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:22 AM
To: scadasec at news.infracritical.com
Subject: Re: [SCADASEC] Listserver responses

No, I actually meant We About Ideas!

Okay, I think we all may have missed the joke...

Now back to SCADA...

Mark Fabro CISSP, CISM
President and CEO
Lofty Perch, Inc.
fabro at loftyperch.com
(647)226-4225 direct

----- Original Message -----
From: scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com
<scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com>
To: scadasec at news.infracritical.com <scadasec at news.infracritical.com>
Sent: Tue Feb 19 10:05:28 2008
Subject: Re: [SCADASEC] Listserver responses

Don't you mean "We're All About Ideas"?  That's probably more catchy of a
phrase.  I'm all for it, Mark.  ;)

Or how some of these alternatives?

"Ideas in the Making"
"Ideas Today, Solutions Tomorrow"
"Blossoming Ideas Today for Tomorrow's Solutions"
"Danger: Geniuses at Work"

These are just a few...

-rad

P.S.  I've got some graphics editors and can whip up something fairly quick
for a logo.  Any ideas anyone???

----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Fabro [mailto:fabro at loftyperch.com]
To: scadasec at news.infracritical.com
Subject: Re: [SCADASEC] Listserver responses

> Apologize for my less-than-perfect linguistic skills in that last note...
>
> I  do propose, however,  the list motto be made:
>
> SCADASEC- We About Ideas
>
> I think it is catchy. Will wait for Bob to comment
>
> M
>
>
>
>
>
> Mark Fabro CISSP, CISM
> President and CEO
> Lofty Perch, Inc.
> fabro at loftyperch.com
> (647)226-4225 direct
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com
> <scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com>
> To: scadasec at news.infracritical.com <scadasec at news.infracritical.com>
> Sent: Tue Feb 19 09:11:16 2008
> Subject: Re: [SCADASEC] Listserver responses
>
> This is interesting indeed! I am not sure on which side I sit.
>
> Just to play, what about those that have some significant contribution to
> make and need to make it in a timely fashion, but seek no attribution from
> their peers or employers? There are indeed situations where names just
> cannot be attached.
>
> Also, as sad as it may be, there is a history of good postings not given
> credit due to the fact the author was not liked very much and the post was
> dismissed. Maybe I am in an odd position as I know many of the faces
behind
> the nyms. We do live in a society where we need handles to get a point
> heard.
>
> Personally, I do not care who is doing the posting as I like to think the
> list is we about ideas. Thankfully, I do not see too much garbage on this
> list posted by anonymous folks. I am hoping that statement does not
> instigate a thread to disprove me :)
>
> Mark
>
> ...no....wait...call me 'scadarrific'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mark Fabro CISSP, CISM
> President and CEO
> Lofty Perch, Inc.
> fabro at loftyperch.com
> (647)226-4225 direct
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com
> <scadasec-bounces at news.infracritical.com>
> To: scadasec at news.infracritical.com <scadasec at news.infracritical.com>
> Sent: Tue Feb 19 08:44:46 2008
> Subject: Re: [SCADASEC] Listserver responses
>
> From: Myrcurial <myrcurial at 100percentgeek.net>
>
> > I cannot extend that self-same trust to a public list.
>
> Would you give the list an idea of why anonymity would be a good thing? 
>
> Why would a person not want to reveal who they are?
>
> What would we miss by insisting that participants use their real names?
>
> Jake Brodsky
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please visit:
> http://news.infracritical.com/mailman/listinfo/scadasec
>
> To review our privacy statement, please visit:
> http://www.infracritical.com/privacy.html
>
> scadasec at news.infracritical.com
> http://news.infracritical.com/mailman/listinfo/scadasec
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please visit:
http://news.infracritical.com/mailman/listinfo/scadasec

To review our privacy statement, please visit:
http://www.infracritical.com/privacy.html

scadasec at news.infracritical.com
http://news.infracritical.com/mailman/listinfo/scadasec

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.infracritical.com/pipermail/scadasec/attachments/20080219/d1864e38/attachment.html 